Sunday, September 30, 2007

Deserves To Be Preserved

Thoughts sparked reading few articles about the so called 150 years old dream of Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project. Is it really of national economic interest or is it a collateral damage to the national heritage? No doubt the project is cent percent for the national economy; but the current alignment of dredging through Ram Sethu will jinx the Indian heritage.

India has a peninsular coast with trades juggling between the western countries, the west coast and the east coast. The presence of Ram Sethu with its shallow waters forces the ships to circumnavigate Sri Lanka, which of course is a longer sailing. The Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project's current alignment is to dredge a two way canal across the Palk Straits between India and Sri Lanka. This will cut short an additional distance of 254-424 nautical miles and 21-36 hours of sailing time. This will directly benefit the shipping industry; the Indian exports will get competitive globally and a few more will assist the booming Indian economy.

If there’s such an extent of economic benefit, why are the protests from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the VHP, the BJP and the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha?

Ram Sethu, also known as Adam's bridge, is a 48 km chain of limestone shoals, between the islands of Mannar, near north-western Sri Lanka, and Rameshwaram, off the south-eastern coast of India. Sea is very shallow, being only 3ft to 30 ft deep in places. Ram Sethu, as indicated in Sanskrit epic Ramayana, was the bridge built, and used by Rama and his allies to rescue Sita from Ravana; hence of great importance to Hindu heritage. Adam's bridge is of Islamic importance, as indicated by a legend; Adam used this bridge to reach Adam's Peak in Sri Lanka, where he stood repentant on one foot for 1000 years.

Ram Sethu defines not just the Indian historical importance; but provides a shield to southern Kerala against Tsunami. Local fishermen also say that the present canal would destroy marine life and corals. This will kill the shell trades which has a turnover of Rs 150 crores per annum. Invaluable thorium deposits would be affected which is important for Indian nuclear projects.

Then what’s the gamble? There’s a race to control the oil transit route; Indian competitors being China. With “String of Pearls”, being the line of strategic base points from Straights of Persian Gulf via the Indian Ocean to South China Sea, China has taken the lead. Realizing this, the political spear heads in Delhi have been trying the best in their counter attack; the most important being the Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project as Sri Lanka is now the trump card in the game. And of course the US of A has to be there in the game when it is OIL as China's rising maritime power is encountering American maritime power along the sea lines of communication (SLOCs) that connect China to vital energy resources in the Middle East and Africa. The US grand plan for 1000 ships naval flotilla and the US Navy operational directive refusing to accept the sea between India and Sri Lanka as 'historic' is pushing the UPA to get the project done. On the other side, Tamil Nadu DMK government and their Non-Brahmin attitude is ignoring the beliefs of millions on Ramayana. Added to this, Tuticorin Port Trust has sent a report to the UPA stating that the canal can be dredged through Ram Sethu. Other experts also doubt the existence of Rama and whether humans were involved in producing any of the patterns. As result the current canal alignment seems to be the decision for the secular government.

Then what could be the solution than jeopardizing millions’ belief and heritage? A re-alignment of the canal which is surely available is the solution. This will safeguard the heritage and maintain national security without touching Ram Sethu. It will also ensure the economic growth by having a different alignment. Nobody is opposing the Sethusamudram project, but only the current alignment. Let’s stand together in support of the project; but a different alignment which will preserve Ram Sethu - राम सेतु!

7 comments:

Unknown said...

I tend to be a bit communist when it comes to economy and the benefits reaped out of any resource. I'd will definitely side by the fishermen who are making a living out of the shell trading in palk straight rather than multinationals digging an oil well and making one more story of the rich getting richer.

As far as saving time in shipping goes, from the east coast to the west, the distance between mangalore and chennai is not more than 400 miles. A distance which is traversed within 6-7 hrs in the more developed nations. Why not build better roads thats traverse the nation which which not only help cut down travel time, but on the long run will save huge $$$$ on fuel and vehicle maintenance.

Just my 2 cents. The very reason that USA lobbies every darn country that has a potential oil resource irks me to no end. US is the largest consumer of oil and will be until they are forced not to. If any digging is done on their behest , it would more of less give them some amount of control of the oil coming out as well. Ours is a country of a billion people, and also on the verge of being a big oil consumer as well. Currently paying about one and half times more for gasoline than the US. Shouldn't one thinking about passing on all the benefits to India alone if at all we go in this direction?

Josh said...

chindhi kananno ;)

Beacon said...

This is what well known Historian Romila Thapar has said
"the conflict between Ram and Ravan probably reflects an exaggerated version of local conflicts, occurring between expanding kingdoms of the Ganges plain and the less sedentary societies of the Vindhyan region ... the transference of events to a more southerly location may have been the work of editors (of the Ramayana) of a later period, reflecting an expanded geography, as was possibly also the case in the depiction of Lanka itself as a city of immense wealth"
NASA's statement
"The images reproduced on the websites may well be ours, but their interpretation is certainly not ours. Remote sensing images or photographs from orbit cannot provide direct information about the origin or age of a chain of islands, and certainly cannot determine whether humans were involved in producing any of the patterns seen"
Geological Survey of India
A three-year study by the Geological Survey of India around Rameswaram and Adam’s Bridge, based on drilling holes into the submerged rock, also found “no evidence” of man-made structures

Finally its about being Rational or emotional and
Faith Vs History,Geology, Archeology

Quote by Praful Bidwai
"Each time the Indian state bends to fundamentalist pressure, it compromises itself, and allows public reason to be trumped by religious belief or private prejudice. This isn't the mark of a society that aspires to modernity, tolerance and pluralism"

Sanukuttan said...

I think, we should leave whether Rama existed? or check the genuinity of the bridge, lets leave Rama, Krishna, Alla, Jesus....
Now the question; whether the bridge is cultural importance for Indians. Yes it is.
I guess you missed out the Afidavit filed questioning the existence of Rama in the article from which BJP actually too the matter.
Bjp here is clearly trying to make use of the situation, trying to gain as much votes ...they are looking at another Ayodhya here.
Karunanidi on the other hand, not sure why he is so keen on this and dared to speak against Rama in a state like TN. Rama is not that popular in TN as like in North India where Dusera n other festivals are of great importance.He would never in life touch the "Devis"(cultural goddess) of TN or Murugan or other Gods who are worshiped in south India.
Clearly people are seeing it more of a political issue than whats its all about.
If there is an option as changing the alignment or course of the canal and building it, i would vote for it.

Rohini said...

I am against the project. It is an ecological disaster waiting to happen.
Coral will be destroyed and themarine life obliterated. Long term damage to India's shoreline may also not be ruled out. Who has done an envronmental impact study or wave/current simulations?

It may save some distance for shipping companies but an average consumer will never benefit from it, it will just add more money to their pockets....

I think there is no difference between karunanidhi and the talibans (both tend to destruct/destroy artifacts in the name of religion).

Raj said...

This is very good read guys - http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/01inter.htm

Raj said...

In a recent Rediff interview of an archaeologist, Dr T Satyamurthy has commented about the ASI affidavit to the Supreme Court which said the Rama Sethu was not a man-made structure. An answer to a question was hilarious:

Why were no archaeological excavations done in the area?

Archaeological excavations in the independent India are done only if there is a problem over there. We don't go and dig anywhere. :-)

For more, read http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/11inter.htm